Our Man in Vienna

powered by viennanet.info
  • Home
  • About
  • The Key
  • Jazz
  • Poems
  • Politics
  • Polemics
  • 3.Reich
  • 4.Reich
  • Watchlist
  • Epigrams
  • Women
  • Projects
  • Novel
  • ART

a web-serial by Harry Kuhner

Latest

  • Speaking German in a Dream
  • „Hermagoras“ Shenenigans
  • -En Route with Herbert Kuhner (The Movie)
  • -Harry`s Film Impressions (35)
  • -Dictators and Good Deeds
  • -Dick to Henry the Kiss (of Death)
  • -A Monster
  • -Harry VRB Martin Luksan
  • -The Way We Want it to Be
  • -Being Partisan
  • -Vjera Vitošević (Montenegro)
  • -Speaking German in a Dream/3
  • -Samuel Greenberg Austro-American Poet
  • -Democracy in Action
  • -Jehovah & Job Redux
  • -Utter Foolishness
  • -Trump and DeSantis
  • -The Supremes
  • -Shooting Up he Place
  • -Rušimo granice | Überwinden wir Grenzen | Breaking down Borders
  • -Supreme Leaking
  • -Past and Present Deeds Are Placed in Proper Perspective
  • -Pan Putin
  • -Old Days
  • -Kick-Ass Drummers
  • -Speaking German in a Dream/2
  • -The Pope and Dogs and Cats
  • -Democracy in Action
  • -Hans Reiter
  • -Whiteface
  • -Speaking German in a Dream
  • -Bush… Afghanistan
  • -Three Guys in White Kaftans
  • -Questions
  • -Good-Bad Guys and Gals
  • -Ten Austrian Jewish Women Poets
  • -TANGO-KONTINUUM (Edition Tarantel)
  • -Off Limits for European Pizza-Lovers
  • -Don and Ron – Polly-Andrews
  • -Don the Don and His Gal
  • -Clamoring at the Southern Gates
  • -A Poem from a New Book by David B. Axelrod
  • -Shooting Up the Place
  • -The Golden Anniversary of the Annexation
  • -A Day in the Park
  • –Harry`s Film Impressions (35)
  • -THE ART OF BEING TOO JEWISH
  • -Dancing2
  • -“Fine People”
  • -DON and the POLICE
  • -Heine
  • -Dancing
  • -The Key
  • -A White Knight, an Elderly Damsel and Three Black Brigands
  • -Ebner and Intermediaries
  • -Epigrams
  • -Hitler Meets the Mufti and Otto Mühl
  • -Peter Handke and Srebrenica
  • -Timeless Padhi
  • -Too Much Cotton
  • -Interdenominational Occurrences
  • -Überkonfessionelle Ereignisse
  • -Es ist alles so kompliziert (© Martin Luksan)
  • -“Fine” Klu-Kluxers and Others
  • -Harry`s Film Impressions (34)
  • -Harry`s Film Impressions (33)
  • -What’s the Difference? and Other Political Aspects
  • -VALIE EXPORT Goes Guggeheim & Jewish Museum
  • -Willy, Herby and Harry: Better Late than Never
  • -Harry`s Film Impressions (32)
  • -Harry`s Film Impressions (31)
  • -Samuel Laster, Founder & Editor of “Die Jüdische”
  • -Harry`s Film Impressions (30)
  • -Harry`s Film Impressions (29)
  • -Harry`s Film Impressions (28)
  • -Harry`s Film Impressions (27)
  • -Henry and Polonius
  • -Harry`s Film Impressions (26)
  • -Pope Francis and Hitmen
  • -Margarethe Herzele, Poet and Artist
  • -Harry`s Film Impressions (25)
  • -Harry`s Film Impressions (24)
  • -Harry`s Film Impressions (23)
  • -The Past and the Present in a Nutshell
  • -Harry`s Film Impressions (22)
  • -Harry`s Film Impressions (21)
  • -Harry`s Film Impressions (20)
  • -Harry`s Film Impressions (19)
  • -Harry`s Film Impressions (18)
  • -Bussing Bush
  • -Harry`s Film Impressions (17)
  • -Harry`s Film Impressions (16)
  • -Harry`s Film Impressions (15)
  • -Harry`s Film Impressions (14)
  • -Harry`s Film Impressions (13)
  • -Harry`s Film Impressions (12)
  • -Harry`s Film Impressions (11)
  • -ONEOFUS
  • -Events
  • -Happy Holidays

Links

   Wienerblut
   Harry´s Memoir
   Poetrybay
   David B. Axelrod
   Martin Luksan
   Proverbis
   Die Jüdische
  Padhiland

Archives

  • November 2024
  • Oktober 2024
  • Dezember 2023
  • November 2023
  • Juli 2023
  • Mai 2023
  • Februar 2023
  • Januar 2023
  • November 2022
  • September 2022
  • Juli 2022
  • Juni 2022
  • Mai 2022
  • März 2022
  • Februar 2022
  • Januar 2022
  • November 2021
  • Oktober 2021
  • August 2021
  • Juli 2021
  • Juni 2021
  • Mai 2021
  • April 2021
  • März 2021
  • Februar 2021
  • Januar 2021
  • Dezember 2020
  • November 2020
  • September 2020
  • August 2020
  • Juni 2020
  • April 2020
  • März 2020
  • Februar 2020
  • Januar 2020
  • Dezember 2019
  • November 2019
  • Oktober 2019
  • September 2019
  • August 2019
  • Juli 2019
  • Juni 2019
  • Mai 2019
  • April 2019
  • März 2019
  • Februar 2019
  • Januar 2019
  • Dezember 2018
  • November 2018
  • Oktober 2018
  • September 2018
  • August 2018
  • Juli 2018
  • Juni 2018
  • Mai 2018
  • April 2018
  • März 2018
  • Februar 2018
  • Januar 2018
  • Dezember 2017
  • November 2017

Categories

  • Allgemein
  • Biographic
  • Epigrams
  • Film
  • Jazz
  • Poetry
  • Polemics
  • Politics
  • Reviews
  • Satire
  • Text
  • Translation
  • Translations

Meta

  • Anmelden
  • Beitrags-Feed (RSS)
  • Kommentare als RSS
  • WordPress.org
496804
Users Today : 69
Users Yesterday : 50
This Month : 1290
This Year : 17999
Total Users : 199804
Views Today : 92
Total views : 1909193
Who's Online : 1

-Harry`s Film Impressions (17)

von Herbert Kuhner am 14. Januar 2019 um 11:41
Veröffentlicht in: Film, Text

Homage to the Thalia

I remember the old Thalia well. It was located off Broadway at 95th Street. The daily fare was two foreign double-feature films with subtitles which were shown for the duration of a day. There was an elaborate folded program on which the films were invariably described as “masterpieces.” Most of the films were French. They were directed by such masters as René Clair, Julian Duvivier, Marcel Carné and Jean Cocteau. The names alone are music.


You went to see Hollywood films in theaters that resembled Moroccan palaces. Some of the films were black-and-white, but many were in Technicolor. I saw a lot of good ones at those venues, but the Thalia is where I got my education. It was the antithesis of being luxurious. Rundown and ramshackle is the best description. The films were the “Vielle Vague.” The Nouvelle Vague had not yet struck the cinematic shore.

I frequented the Thalia in the mid-Fifties while I attended Columbia. I spent hours and hours sitting on its hard, uncomfortable seats, watching black-and-white French films of the Thirties and Forties. Now and then, the film would break and you had to wait for it to be spliced before you could continue watching it.

Yes there was irritation and discomfort, but film is the thing.

What can I say? Where else could I have seen those wonderful French films? I don’t know what my life would have been like if I could not look back on the Thalia.

Attending the Thalia was like drinking vin ordinaire to a crisp baguette – or in other words, a fare of nectar and ambrosia.

 

Remember the Days!

Who was Lincoln Theodore Monroe Andrew Perry? He was Stepin Fetchit? Who dat? Here’s Stepin to provide he answer: “I was the Sammy Davis of the Stone Age.” Stepin was the “sacred nigger” of the Thirties and Forties Bs. He’d turn up on his tiptoes with eyes bugging when there was a threat of gangsters or ghosts. He was good for a laugh or two. Stepin was a nice fellow who wasn’t too smart and he was just plain scared when he thought that danger loomed.

Stepin Fetchit

That’s how we saw blacks in those days. The women were mammies and the men were “Stepin.” (Actually his Jewish counterpart was Jerry Lewis, who was the stereotypical schlemiel. But that cliché lasted longer.)

High Sierra, directed by Raoul Walsh in 1941, stars Bogey as gangster on the lam and Ida Lupino as his loyal girlfriend. Bogey’s star was rising and he’d go on to Casablanca. Ida’s star was falling and she’d go on to starring and directing Bs. Walsh was a good and successful director, but he stooped in Sierra to using Stepin for a few cheap laughs.


The “Stepin” image was so ingrained that even one of Hollywood’s best directors apparently couldn’t free himself from it.

Thank God those days are over!

 

From Stromboli to The Visit

Ingrid Bergman left Hollywood to make Stromboli for Roberto Rosselini in 1949. Her intention was to leave Tinsel-Town glamour behind her to in order make neo-realistic European films. And Roberto’s manly appeal may have influenced her decision. Roberto had made Roma, Open City and Paisa, which are indeed stunning. Some film buffs love the films he made with Bergman. I think Stromboli was so-so, but that all the others were duds.

Twenty-five years later she starred in a film version of Friedrich Dürrenmatt’s The Visit directed by stickler Bernhard Wicki, which was a European production. Wicki had died a thousand deaths when he filmed Morituri with Marlon Brando. Brando had moved Heaven and Earth to get Wicki on the set, but once he had him, he made Wicki regret that he had ever been born. And the result of Wicki’s tribulations was nothing to be proud of. Ditto for Ingrid.

In Dürrenmatt’s play, an unattractive, crippled old lady returns to her hometown as a wealthy, powerful revenge-seeker in order to bring about the lynching of the man who seduced and ruined her. However, in the film “the old lady” turns out to be younger, attractive and with limbs intact. Instead of having her quondam lover, the present mayor, done in, she relents and shows mercy.


Thus Bergman rewrote and “glamorized” one of the most significant and successful contemporary plays, riding roughshod over author and director. And Hollywood celebrated a triumph over realism, neo-realism, surrealism and what-have-you, albeit in Europe. And thus Bergman propelled herself right smack back to the spirit she had left behind in Tinsel Town.

 

to be continued . . .

– Herbert Kuhner

-Harry`s Film Impressions (16)

von Herbert Kuhner am 5. Januar 2019 um 22:13
Veröffentlicht in: Film, Text

Putting on Weight

There’s a Hollywood myth about Lawrence Olivier and Dustin Hoffman: Hofmann is reputed to have gone without sleep for a whole weekend in order to be convincing in a scene in Marathon Man. Olivier is alleged to have suggested to the dishevelled Hofmann: “Why don’t you try acting, dear boy?!”

from „Marathon Man“ 1976

Robert De Niro, Silvester Stallone, George Clooney, Matt Damon, Jared Leto, Nicole Kidman, Renée Zellweger, Charlize Theron, Meryl Streep and Megan Fox have something in common. They all put on weight for film roles.

This is sheer and utter madness. Putting on and losing weight drastically a can result in quick or slow death.

Giving your all for a role should be limited to creating an illusion. It should not entail risking your health and life.

Take a look at the stars of black-and-white yesteryear! How about the great toupées and dental work!

Of course an illusion of extra poundage is not so easy to create. But how about letting the make-up man have a go!

An actor can act fat and camera angles can help him along.

“Why don’t you try acting, dear boys and girls?!

 

From Adolf to Anton

Present day haute couture consists of so called “work clothes,” not to mention body art.
Tattoos and piercings are now very much en vogue. A luxury touch for the fair sex consists of sequined or bejeweled jeans.

Yes, fashion is in a free fall.

The upper class now wants to look like the under class, but appearance is not the only connection they have to those “below” them. The cultural borders between classes are now disappearing. There’s only one slight difference: the bank account.

The four sartorial icons of film were Fred Astaire, Cary Grant, Noel Coward and
Anton Walbrook. Their day is long gone.

Adolf/Anton Wohlbrueck

Anton Walbrook was epitome of continental elegance. He not only belongs to another time, but to another world.

He was born in Vienna in 1896 when Adolf was a neutral name, and he started out in Austrian and German films as Adolf Wohlbrück.

He was not an admirer of his namesake, and after the other Adolf took the reins in Germany, he was glad to have the opportunity of acting in a Hollywood film and to depart to other shores. In 1936 Adolf Wohlbrück became Anton Walbrook for The Soldier and the Lady.

Among Anton’s great roles were the haughty impresario of The Red Shoes and the prologue in La Ronde. As far as I am concerned, the word “masterpiece” fits both.

La Ronde, based on the great Schnitzler play, was an encyclopedia of French acting of the Forties and Fifties. The question is: who isn’t in it?

Max Ophuls, the director, conveys the ambiance of fin-de-siècle Vienna so very beautifully and so very sadly.

The sets of Vienna are just that: sets – but what sets they are! The sets are sets that represent the location; they are not the location. Remember Henry V with Laurence Olivier! The painted sets had a similar effect.

Walbrook is the ringmaster who announces the characters and scenes as a carousel turns. He sings La Ronde, with music by Oscar Strauss and lyrics by Louis Ducreux. Walbrook’s role was an innovation. It was written into the film by the director and script writer. And how right they were!

I saw the film at the age of fifteen in 1950. It has become the play for me. I have never seen another production and I never will.

Walbrook’s rendering the song is wistful and bittersweet. He seems to sing all there is say about love. The words and music are there, but there is so much more between the notes and lines.

 

Aussies and the Fair Sex

In A Town Like Alice, Jean Paget, an Englishwoman and Joe Harman, an Australian mechanic are prisoners of the Japanese in Malay. They fall in love. Joe steals a chicken for the women prisoners and is caught by a prison guard. As punishment, the camp commander has him crucified in front of the women.


The lovers are separated before they are liberated, but they find each other after the war and Jean marries Joe and goes with him to the Australian backwater town of Willstown, which is not a town like Alice Springs, but rather its primitive opposite.

On a hot steamy day, Jean goes to the local bank for a transaction. The bank is a doppelganger for a Turkish bath. The sweat is running down Jean’s face and her print dress is sticking to her. When Jean suggests to the bank director that he install air-conditioning, he tells her to mind her own beeswax in the traditional Aussie manner. A woman who has spent half a dozen years in confinement at the hands of the gentlemanly Japanese, certainly isn’t going to take backwater-talk from a boorish Aussie. Jean’s reply isn’t fit for print. She tells him where to go and what he can do there.

Now we get to the point! When Joe hears about the altercation, he is fuming mad – not at the director, but at his wife. In Alice Springs, men are rough and tough, but ladies have to be swand genteel. And ladies must not let scatalogical language emerge from their sweet lips.

The man who was crucified for Jean cannot forgive her use of words reserved for men.

No, they do not part, but they did get dangerously close to saying adieu.

 

to be continued . . .

– Herbert Kuhner

-Harry`s Film Impressions (15)

von Herbert Kuhner am 29. Dezember 2018 um 14:05
Veröffentlicht in: Film, Text

The Devil’s General and the “Idealist”

Karl Zuckmayer and Ernst Udet were friends.

Zuckmayer, who was half-Jewish and an anti-Nazi, left Germany for Austria when Hitter rose to power. In 1938, he left Austria for Switzerland and then emigrated to the United States.

Udet, a daredevil pilot helped build the Luftwaffe up after Hitler came to power. He was not on good terms with the Nazis and was skeptical about their ability to win a world war. After the victory of the Royal Air Force in the Battle of Britain, his skepticism increased. He committed suicide in November of 1941, after Nazi Germany invaded the Soviet Union – before victories turned into defeat.


I saw the film version of the Devil’s General in an East Side Art Theater in 1955, the year of its release. At the time something bothered me and it still does. Oberst Friedrich Eilers is described as a Nazi idealist General Harry Harras is The Devil’s General aka Ernst Udet., Ingenieur Karl Oderbruch is Harras’ friend. Oderbruch has been sabotaging fighter planes and Eilers flies in one of them to his death. Thus Oderbruch was responsible for the death of their mutual friend, a man who believed in “the cause.” The denouement is the death of Harras who commits suicide by crashing one of the defect planes into the airport.

Here’s my problem: How can a Nazi be a Nazi idealist? Isn’t that a contrast in terms? What as Zuckmayer getting at? Did he think there was such a conglomerate as a man of integrity who believed in the cause? The cause was dishonorable, and you cannot fight honorably for a dishonorable cause.
National Socialism was a German nationalistic ideology that advocated the conquest and enslavement of other nations, as well as racial purity, and in order to achieve that purity, Germany engaged in genocide

That’s as clear as can be. The goals were candidly stated by Hitler and his cohorts. You can very well be a Nazi, but you cannot be a Nazi and an idealist.

Marxism is another matter. Marxism is internationalist ideology that advocates meliorism. You can be a Marxist and an idealist (albeit, some might say a misguided one). Stalin used Marxism as a cover for conquest, enslavement and mass murder.

Autor: Carl Zuckmayer.Foto: Archiv S. Fischer Verlag.

What was Zuckmayer getting at? Did he want to provide an alibi for some advocates of National Socialism? Were they good people who were duped? I say definitely not! Those who believed in the “cause” knew what it was all about.

 

Inglorious Basterds (sic) and Inglorious Depictions

Here are some inglorious Third Reich depictions:

In Hogan’s Heroes, the Sixties World-War-Two sit-com series, the German officers and soldiers are presented as likeable bunglers constantly outsmarted by the allied prisoners. There is absolutely no reference to Nazi propaganda, nor is there ever any physical abuse. (Auschwitz must have been on another planet.)


This series, which is constantly rebroadcast on German TV, is an idealization of National Socialism, which goes far beyond what any Third-Reich Revisionist could cook up.

The award-winning Life Is Beautiful, starts out as a tepid B-film slapstick love-affair à la Buster Keaton, bicycle-for-two and all. Keaton was, however, A-fair, but Beautiful never pokes its head out of the B-category. (Buster, please forgive me for making this sacrilegious comparison!)

Then the romantic peace-time slapstick fades into war-time slapstick. The transition is very mild.

Even internment a German Death Camp can’t cast a shadow over the hero’s good mood and the sunny upbringing of his small son.

As he is marched to death, he parodies the goose step, giving his son, who is watching, the final comic touch. The “bang” is off-screen. Of course, the German guard didn’t knock him down and shoot him on the spot, which was the usual reaction to mockery.

“Violence is one of the most fun things to watch,” says Quentin Tarantino. “Would I watch a kung-fu movie three days after the Sandy Hook massacre?” he asks. “Maybe. Because they have nothing to do with each other,” he answers.

I don’t know, but I wouldn’t be so sure!


In Pulp Fiction, which is a fitting title, Samuel L. Jackson plays a hit man who quotes Biblical verse – a very amusing touch which provides some chuckles. Of course, there would have been no likelihood of any hit man delving into the Bible before 1994.

The Inglorious Basterds want to take revenge on the Nazis for Auschwitz, and indeed there were Jewish American soldiers, as well as other Jews, who hunted down SS members to give them their own medicine.

Christoph Waltz in is an SS Officer like no other. He’s a fine actor and his bravura over-the-top performance is a fascinating rug-chewing, leap away from reality, as is the whole film, minus the adjective “fascinating.”
In Basterds the roles are reversed. Is this wishful thinking? Here are some “fun things to watch.” The Jewish avengers emulate the Nazis in brutality, murdering and bludgeoning – and even scalping as they go along. In the last scene Waltz’s SS officer gets the swastika carved onto his forehead by a bloodthirsty Brad Pitt. Before this flesh-work scene, Hitler, Goebbels, Göring and consorts are burned to a crisp in a Paris movie theater. How’s that for historical accuracy?

Christoph Waltz

More Tarrantino: “I hate that hand-wringing shit. Holocaust movies always have Jews as victims,” We’ve seen that story before. I want to see something different. Let’s see Germans that are scared of Jews. Let’s not have everything build up to a big misery, let’s actually take the fun of action-movie cinema and apply it to this situation….One of the things that’s interesting to me is equating the Jews in this case with the Indians in a Western. Maybe it’s not nothing that I’m 25percent Cherokee Indian. If I go do a movie of Jewish Americans fighting back in World War II, then I equate them with the other race that I am, and I use the Indian battle plan, their methods, to attack the Nazis. Why isn’t that all right? He’s a Nazi! They’re giving him a scar. I don’t know if I would even go so far as to call that torture. He’s scarring him. He’s not torturing him. What he’s doing isn’t so ridiculously painful.”

Tarantino’s characters speak and act. Brad Pitt‘s Lt. Aldo Raine: “We will be cruel to the Germans, and through our cruelty they will know who we are. They will find the evidence of our cruelty in the disemboweled, dismembered, and disfigured bodies of their brothers we leave behind us. Every man under my command owes me 100 Nazi scalps.”

Bat-wielding “Bear Jew” (played by Eli Roth, the horror film director): “It’s almost a deep sexual satisfaction of wanting to beat Nazis to death, an orgasmic feeling. My character gets to beat Nazis to death. That’s something I could watch all day. My parents are very strong about Holocaust education. My grandparents got out of Poland and Russia and Austria, but their relatives did not.”[1]

A personal note: Members of my family were victims of the Nazis. I was present at the age of three when SA-marauders ransacked my grandmother’s apartment. If I’d had the chance in later years, I’d have polished off those SA-criminals without batting an eye. And I’d have gone off whistling. That of course would have been an “ideal” situation that almost never occurs.

I definitely do not want to be a victim, but the last thing I want to be on this earth is a Nazi.

The theme of Jewish revenge for Auschwitz is a serious theme which could indeed be brought to film, but with some sort of factual basis, rather than as a simple sadistic revenge-fantasy.

“Inglorious” fits these depictions to T!

 

to be continued . . .

– Herbert Kuhner

-Harry`s Film Impressions (14)

von Herbert Kuhner am 24. Dezember 2018 um 12:27
Veröffentlicht in: Film, Text

A Movie House on the West Side

There was a small film theater on the West Side where they showed German and Austrian  films. The name of the theater is the only thing I forgot. It was frequented by elderly emigrés. The décor fit the audience. The walls ere embellished by candelabras. The atmosphere was compatible the films, which were mostly Thirties fare – films that had been made when old Europe was still old Europe.

I remember a double feature I saw in the Fifties. Ditte menneskebarn (Denmark, 1946) and Wiener Blut (Austria then “Ostmark,” 1942).


Beautiful Ditte went through much of her film topless, and that of course was visually pleasurable. Such occurrences were limited to foreign films at the time.

Wiener Blut, an “operettic” film, was directed by Willi Forst in 1942. Forst directed and acted in musical films before the Third Reich period and during that period. He continued going his musical way after Nazi Germany had annexed Austria, but he never engaged in propaganda. When Veit Harlan, the director of Jud Süss, called him and offered him the leading role, Forst shouted into the receiver: “Are you out of your mind?!”


As the titles of Wiener Blut came on to waltz music in that old New York movie house, you could have cut through the nostalgia with a knife. The audience was transported to days gone by – days before ’33 in Germany and ’before ‘38 in Austria. Elderly eyes moistened. Yes, those were the good old days in the old country. Those were the days before Berlin blood and Viennese blood was shed.

The shedding of blood may have been staunched, but days prior to that shedding were gone forever, but now one viewing a film which showed the spirit of days gone by, the spirit of how things were – or how they were envisioned.

Willi Forst depicted those days in Austria. It was his specialty. Perhaps he sprinkled too much confectionary sugar on his cinematographic concoctions, but there was some truth to it. It may not have been quite that way, but all in all you couldn’t say it wasn’t that way at all.

The film that was being viewed was made in 1942. That was not the way things were at all at the time. It was a time when murder became methodical and gained momentum. It would accelerate until it reached its peak. The deportations of those who had remained in Europe had begun would soon be in I full force.

Yes, but on the screen of that movie house you could see a film with light-hearted music and song.

 

Mission in Propaganda

Mission to Moscow was Michael Curtiz’ follow-up to Casablanca in 1943, with another script by Howard Koch. This non-masterpiece was made at the request of F. D. R. Curtiz was renowned as a cynic, and maybe that’s his excuse. What the hell, if the president says do it, who was Curtiz to quibble?

Our ally of the time Josef Stalin is not only made palatable, he is presented as a man to admire. The show trials of Stalin’s fellow revolutionaries in the film are legitimate legal procedures, in which all confess to being Trotskyite traitors in the pay of Nazi Germany. And these blackguards get their just deserts, which conveniently occurs off celluloid. There is no mention that Stalin had Trotsky polished off in Mexico, two years prior to the release of the flm.


The Allies needed the manpower of the Soviet Union to defeat Nazi Germany. Was Mission made to butter the dictator up? Did Stalin need such cajoling in order to fight on? And what was the purpose of presenting such fabrications to film theater audiences of the time?

The Russians bore the brunt of the fighting, and their losses were over twenty million, which didn’t faze Stalin in the least. After the war, he added to the casualties by transferring Russian prisoners of war and slave laborers to the gulags or killing them outright after repatriation. Only a traitor would let himself be captured or work as a slave for the enemy. But that lay in the future when the film was made.

Here we have a rose-colored evaluation of the invasion of Poland by the otherwise great Winston Churchill on October 1, 1939: “We could have wished that the Russian armies should be standing on the present line as the friends of Poland instead of invaders. But that Russian should stand on this line was clearly necessary for the safety of Russia against the Nazi menace. At any rate, the line is there, and an eastern front has been created that Germany does not dare assail. When Herr von Ribbentrop was summoned to Moscow last week, it was to learn the fact and to accept the fact that the Nazi designs upon Baltic States and upon the Ukraine must come to a dead stop.”

Oh, yes indeed they came to a dead stop in June of 1941. Could Stalin’s decimation of the general staff have had to do anything with that?

Here’s Churchill again on May 24, 1944: “Profound changes have taken place in Soviet Russia. The Trotskyite form of Communism has been completely wiped out.”

“Hallelujah!” is my comment.

This certainly is one of Churchill’s least admirable quotes. Trotsky was ruthless, as he proved by brutally quelling the sailors’ uprising in Kronstadt, but he was a military man and a man not only interested in power for its own sake. If he had prevailed over Stalin, the Soviet army would have (at least) stood its ground against the Wehrmacht.

Yes, Trotskyism was wiped out, as was Trotsky. Stalin had him in mind in August of 1940 when his hit man polished him off in Mexico. What he did not have in mind was preparing for an invasion by Nazi Germany.

The fact of the assassination is conveniently omitted from the Mission film, as well as from Churchill’s evaluation.

I know, I’m writing in hindsight: Stalin’s participation in the war certainly was essential, but was it necessary to kiss a mass murderer’s ass?

 

to be continued . . .

– Herbert Kuhner

-Harry`s Film Impressions (13)

von Herbert Kuhner am 19. Dezember 2018 um 19:43
Veröffentlicht in: Film, Text

Casablanca and Serendipity

I favor starting out with a concept and carrying through to the denouement. However, sometimes chance is a better method than any method.

Ingrid Bergman didn’t jell with Humphrey Bogart and ditto for him. Ingrid also she wasn’t enthralled by the making of Casablanca. The script was ad lib, and there was no ending prior to the end of filming the film. The ending, in which the lovers sacrifice their love for the cause, was tacked on at the last minute. (Later, after Ingrid “eloped” with Roberto Rossellini, there would practically be no script at all for the five films he directed for her. So in a way, Casablanca broke her in.) My view on those films dissents from that of many film buffs. I think serendipity didn’t work out very well for Roberto.

Herman Hupfeld

Who is Herman Hupfeld? He is the composer and lyricist for Down The Old Back Road, A Hut in Hoboken and the stellar Goopy Geer. He also wrote that Fats Waller favorite Let’s Put Out The Lights (And Go To Sleep). And the classic As Time Goes By also came from his pen. Here’s the story of how Time became associated with Casablanca, as related by Frank Miller, the author of the book Casablanca:

”As Time Goes By had been written in the ’20s and had enjoyed moderate success in a recording by Rudy Vallee. But it was the favorite song Murray Burnett, one of the co-authors of the play Everybody Goes to Rick’s. He used the song as the love them for Rick and the leading lady (in the play she’s named Lois). Nobody at Warner’s questioned the use of that song, since the studio owned the rights anyway. When the film had been shot and Max Steiner was ready to score it, he tried to get them to change the song, claiming that it was so musically uninteresting that he couldn’t work it into the score. He also may have wanted to write a new song for the film and possibly make a hit (as he had done with It Can’t Be Wrong, the song he wrote for Now, Voyager). Hal Wallis was ready to make the change, but it meant re-shooting some lines for Ingrid Bergman. And she had already cut her hair short for her role in For Whom the Bell Tolls. Unable to match up the shots, they had to stick with As Time Goes By, which became a bigger hit than ever as a result of its use in this film.”

Casablanca, in my view; is a pot boiler with nary a cliché missing. I’ve said that Michael Curtiz could get good juice out of bad oranges, and this juice is terrific. But Michael did get a little help from serendipity on this one. What if Ronald Reagan and Hedy Lamarr, who were first choice for the roles, had been the stars? And what if Ingrid had not had her hair cut?

At any rate, serendipity is responsible for the inclusion of As Time Goes By in Casablanca and it
“dictated” much of Casablanca, and in this case the right decisions were made.

 

The Best Screenplay

The Screen Writer’s Guild picked the screenplay of Casablanca as the best screenplay ever in 2006, 64 years after the film’s release. Wow!

Here’s what I wrote about Casablanca some years ago: “It is the melodrama of all melodramas and the pot boiler of all pot boilers. The camera is everything but static. It flows from one scene to the next, never stopping for breath, with rhythm that seems completely natural.

“I’ve seen it several times since first seeing it at the Princeton Playhouse, the year of its release. Nary a cliché is missing, but what marvelous direction! Michael Curtiz was a director who could get good juice out of the worst oranges. The script may be a bad orange, or even a lemon, but the film is so masterfully made that it hits the truth.”

Michael Curtiz

Michael Curtiz got good juice out of that orange with some help from Humphrey Bogart and Ingrid Bergman. If Ronald Reagan and Hedy Lamarr, who were first choice for the roles, had played them, Curtiz could have squeezed and squeezed, but his efforts would have resulted in nothing but sour juice.

I suspect that the jurors, who picked the screenplay as number one, had judged the cinematic result, rather than the typescript.

On the other hand, due to the efforts of Michael, Bogey, Ingrid, Claude Rains, Conrad Veidt, Peter Lorre and Sidney Greenstreet, etc., maybe Casablanca is the best screenplay ever put to
celluloid.

Making of Casablanca

Relishing Roles

Who was most instrumental in disseminating German and culture all over the world? That’s right, Adolf Hitler.

Hitler inadvertently helped disseminate German and Austrian culture internationally by driving artists out of those locations for “racial” and political reasons.

Not to be forgotten, there were many whose careers were permanently truncated by death and others whose careers were nipped in the bud. Yes, Hitler and his minions were efficient.

The ones that got away often ended up in the New World. Some went under, but others embarked on successful careers – especially in the arts and music

The roster of German and Austrian directors and actors who landed in Hollywood in the Thirties and Forties is endless.

After the United States entered the war, actors were needed to portray Third Reich villains. In the propaganda pot boilers of the time, who was better suited to play Gestapo and SS-officers than the emigrés in Tinsel Town? They had the accents without trying, and they had the mannerisms down to a T.

Many an emigré found himself donning the uniform of those who had driven him out of Europe.

Werner Klemperer

 

to be continued . . .

– Herbert Kuhner

  • Seite 19 von 37
  • « Erste
  • «
  • 17
  • 18
  • 19
  • 20
  • 21
  • »
  • Letzte »


watchlist to click

Herbert Kuhner ist Übersetzer von neun Sammlungen österreichischer Lyrik, darunter Austrian Poetry Today / Österreichische Lyrik heute. Schocken Books, New York; Carinthian Slovenian Poetry, Hermagoras Verlag, Klagenfurt / Slavica Publishers, Columbus, Ohio; Hawks and Nightingales: Current Burgenland Croatian Poetry, Braumüller Verlag, Wien / Slavica Publishers, Columbus, Ohio.

Contact

Prof. Herbert Kuhner
Writer/Poet/Translator
Gentzgasse 14/4/11
1180 Vienna
Austria
emails: herbert.kuhner@chello.at
T +43 (0)1 4792469
Mob +43 (0)676 6705302 (new)


see also:
wienerblut (third reich recycled)
www.harrykuhner.at (Harry´s Memoir)

A Review of
Harry Kuhners Jazz Poetry
click for more information

click for more information

excerpt: Assembly-Line Prince click picture to find out more...                  

©2017-2024 Our Man in Vienna | Präsentiert von WordPress mit ComicPress | Subscribe: RSS | Nach oben ↑